MANAGEMENT THE NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY
Introduction. Informative revolution of end and distribution of internet-technologies conduces to the sharp strengthening of economic, political and cultural globalization societies, forming of the new social mode, when network streams, network structures and network co-operations, become basis of organization of society. By the most meaningful sources for research of modern network society, organization of that is base on global information technologies there is a scientific inheritance of М. Castells, P. Drucker, М. Porter, H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff. Only scientific vision of network processes of society, their essence, kinds, structure, functions is however absent, contradiction, factors of development and management mechanisms in new realities of development of civilization.
Purpose. The aim of the article of theoretical and methodological ground of network models of organization of society and mechanisms of management of him by political, economic and sociocultural spheres in the conditions of globalization. Methodological basis of research is dialectical principle of cognition, the system, civilization, sinergistical going near the study of the public phenomena and processes, fundamental positions of theory of development of society and management. The cultural and historical is used, historical and anthropological, sociocultural methods that allowed to investigate network organization of society in intersubject cuts.
Results. Essence of networks and their kinds are exposed in the wild and society. A structure, role and place of functional networks, is certain in the system of organization of society. The criteria of division of public social networks are specified on a territorial sign. The features of social are distinguished networks in accordance with the stages of development of civilization. Credible directions of network development of post-industrial society are reasonable. The basic models of the organizational mode of public social networks are analysed. The mechanisms of management of vital functions of new society subsystems are worked out.
Originality. The scientific novelty of the got results consists in the use of, civilization and sinergistical approaches of the systems in explanation of processes of network organization of society and mechanisms of management of him by political, economic and sociocultural spheres in the conditions of globalization.
Conclusions. The network models of organization of society and mechanisms of management of him are reasonable by political, economic and sociocultural spheres in the conditions of globalizationThe practical value of the got results shows up in possibility of the use of them in the process of development of strategy of construction of new society, him organizational structure and control system. The prospects of further scientific secret services can be deepening of researches of separate types of network structures.
Busel, V. T. (Ed.). (2009). Large explanatory dictionary of modern Ukrainian. Kyiv: Perun (in Ukr.).
Darvin, Ch. (2001; First ed. 1872). About expression of emotions for a man and animals. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter (in Russ.).
Martynyshyn, Y. N. (2016). Tsivіlіzatsіya u zatcі bіfurkacії: zarodzhennya new social order and model of the management of the economy, economy and sociocultural spheres. Economy and management of the culture (Ekonomіka і menedzhment kul'turi),1, 5-32. (in Ukr.).
Pavlov, I. P. (2006). Twenty-year experience of objective study of higher activity (behaviors) of animals. Sankt-Peterburg: ISPU (in Russ.).
Fabri, K. (1976). Bases of animal psychology. Moscow: MGU (in Russ.).
Bourdieu, P. (2010). Le Capital Social. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, 45-81.
Castells, M. (2014). The Internet Galaxy. Reflections on the Internet. Business and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Choi, T. Y., & Hong, Y. (2015). Unveiling the Structure of Supply Networks: Case Studies in Honda, Acura, Daimler Chrysler. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 5-32.
Drucker, P. (1992). The New Society of Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 70, 5-37.
Drucker, P. (2001). The Next Society: a Survey of the Near Future. The Economist, 361, 3-9.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London: Routledge.
Euler, L. (1736). The Seven Bridges of Königsburg. Retrieved from http://eulerarchive.maa.org//docs/originals/E053.pdf
Granovetter, M. (2005). Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddednes. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 57-93.
Leydesdorff, L. (2016). Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers.
Lorenz, K. (2009). Mensch auffindet Freund. Vienna: VU.
Lеvi-Strauss, C. (2013). Structural Anthropology. New York: LD.
Man, A. (2014). The Network Economy: Strategy, Structure and Management. Northampton: E. Elgar.
Marshall, A. (2012). Principles of Economics. New York: UTС.
Milgram, S. (2007). The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 2, 28-53.
Moreno, J. L. (2014). Who shall Survive? Washington: DC.
Pareto, V. (2015). Trattato di sociologia generale. Lausanne: LU.
Porter, M. (2009). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. States and Regions, 18, 11-24.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (2010). On Social Structure. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 70, 112-144.
Simmel, G. (2008). Soziologie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Spencer, H. (2012). The Principles of Sociology. London: Pan Books.
Tinbergen, N. (2003). Social Behaviour in Animals. Oxford: OU.
Tönnies, F. (2009). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Berlin: KU.
UK (2010). Big Society Network. London: Author. Retrieved from http://www.thebigsociety.co.uk
Wiese, L. (2001). Philosophie und Soziologie. Köln: KU.
Yang, Ch., & Liu, H.-M. (2012). Boosting Firm Performance Via Enterprise Agility and Network Structure. Management Decision, 50, 64-95.
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.