ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE COMPETITIVE STATUS: GENESIS OF CONCEPT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. The versatility and diversity of definitions of such concepts as “economic security” and “competitive status” generate the need for further development and improvement of the concept “economic security of competitive status” taking into account changes in theoretical and methodological approaches, methodology and views of modern scientists.
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to study the concept of “economic security of competitive status” and its place in the structure of economic security.
Methods. The article uses general scientific methods: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. To analyze the essence of the concept of “economic security of competitive status”, a descriptive approach was used.
Results. The concept of “economic security of competitive status” is considered. The main definitions of the term “competitive status” are defined in terms of the chronology of their appearance in scientific sources. The absence of evolution in scientific views on this term is revealed, which is associated with the duplication of definitions by different authors in the earlier and later periods. Based on the analysis of the lexical meanings of the words “competitive” and “status”, it is substantiated that the determination of competitive status as a certain competitive state is most appropriate. Analyzed the existing approaches to the definition of competitive status. Considered its features. The differences between the concepts of “market security”, “market component of economic security” and “economic security of competitive status” are shown. There is a contradiction in the existing approaches, which consists in applying to the definition of the competitive status of the process approach, and in its assessment - the static one. The expediency of applying to the understanding of the economic nature of security a competitive status at the same time static and process approaches is substantiated.
Originality. The classification of approaches to understanding the essence of competitive status has been added to the following classification criteria: by imperative concepts (a measure of determining a company's position in competition, identifying directly with a company's position, a company's position in competition, a prerequisite for achieving a certain level of competitive advantages, a comprehensive comparative characteristic of an enterprise relative to competitors) ; from the point of view of the resource approach (as the ratio of the actual and basic productivity of the use of resources, resource endowment, degree of provision of the enterprise with resources of all kinds); from the standpoint of taking into account various types of potential (internal potential, strategic potential, potential of competitors; resource potential, competitive potential, potential without specification) from the position of goal-setting (creating and maintaining competitive advantages, resisting environmental factors; maximizing profits, stable business income; capturing leading positions in the industry; anticipation of the opponent in achieving the goals set in a competitive market; without specifying the goal) other signs will determine a goal and objectives of the study. A definition of the economic security of a competitive status as a competitor’s economic condition of an enterprise is proposed, in which a given level of economic results of all types is achieved (in the classical and non-traditional sense), not only its economic interests of a short, medium and long-term nature are realized freely, regardless of the influence of internal factors and the external environment and actions of stakeholders of any group, but also the interests of the staff and owners of this enterprise; it is assumed that all types of resources are used efficiently, the enterprise is able and able to withstand the consequences of the realization of the negative impacts of various origins without jeopardizing the current and strategic economic interests. Since the essence of economic security is a triune one, which also includes the imperative concept of “process”, then from the position of the process approach it is possible and expedient to investigate the economic security of competitive status. Specified is the direction of further research. The structure of its hierarchical levels has been improved.
Conclusion. Conducting unconditionally significant research by modern scientists does not exclude the need to further highlight important issues of processes and resource support for a given level of competitive status of enterprises through the prism of economic security.Article Details
The authors published in this journal agree with following conditions:
1. The authors reserve to themselves the right to the authorship of their works and transfer the right of their first publication to the journal on the terms of Creatіve Common Attrіbutіon Lіcense which allows to freely extend to other persons the published work with an obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and its first publication in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to complete independent additional agreements concerning the not exclusive distribution of their work in the form in which it was published in this journal (for example, to place the work in the electronic storehouse of an establishment or to publish as a monograph component), under the condition of the preservation of the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. The journal’s policy allows and encourage the authors to place their manuscripts into the Internet (for example, in depositories of establishments or on personal web-sites) either before submitting of the manuscript for publication or during its editorial processing as it assists the occurrence of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing of the published work.
AGREEMENT
ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF COPYRIGHT
I, the author of the article / We, the authors of the manuscript _______________________________________________________________________
in case of its acceptance for publication, we transfer the following rights to the founders and editorial boards of the scientific publication "BULLETIN OF THE CHERKASY BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY. ECONOMIC SCIENCES. SERIES "ECONOMIC SCIENCES":
1. Publication of this article in Ukrainian (English, Russian, Polish) and distribution of its printed version.
2. Dissemination of the electronic version of the article through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
At the same time we reserve the right without consent of the editorial board and the founders:
1. Use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes.
2. To use the materials of the article in whole or in part for writing your own theses.
3. Use article materials to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
4. Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
a. personal web-pecypcax of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
b. web-pecypcax of the institutions where the authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
with. non-profit, open-source web-pecypcax (such as arXiv.org).
With this agreement, we also certify that the submitted manuscript meets the following criteria:
1. Does not contain calls for violence, incitement of racial or ethnic enmity, which are disturbing, threatening, shameful, libelous, cruel, indecent, vulgar, etc.
2. Does not infringe the copyrights and intellectual property rights of others or organizations; contains all the references to the cited authors and / or publications envisaged by applicable copyright law, as well as the results and facts used in the article by other authors or organizations.
3. It has not been previously published in other publishers and has not been published in other publications.
4. Does not include materials that are not subject to publication in the open press, in accordance with applicable law.
____________________ ___________________
First name, Last name, signature of the author
"___" __________ 20__
References
Varava, L.M. & Afanasiev, Ye.V. & Mishchuk, Ye.V. (2018). Aktualni problemy suchasnoho menedzhmentu: monohrafiia. Kryvyi Rih: Vyd. R.A. Kozlov, 203. (in Ukr.)
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tomakh (1978). Tom 9, 671 (in Ukr.)
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tomakh (1973). Tom 4, 261 (in Ukr.)
Ansoff, I. (1989). Strategicheskoe upravlenie. Moskva: Ekonomika, 520 (in Russ.)
Ansoff, I. (1999). Novaya korporativnaya strategiya. Sankt-Peterburg: Piterkom, 416 (in Russ.)
Milner, B. (1999). Teoriya organizatsii. Moskva: Infra-M, 316 (in Russ.)
Lapin, Ye. V. (2002). Ekonomicheskiy potentsial predpriyatiya: monografiya. Sumy: ITD «Universitetskaya kniga», 310 (in Russ.)
Shinkarenko, V.G. & Bondarenko, A. S. (2003). Upravlenie konkurentosposobnostyu predpriyatiya. Kharkov: Izd. KhNADU, 188 (in Russ.)
Trydid, O.M. (2003). Stratehiia rozvytku pidpryiemstva v umovakh kryzy. Avtoref. na zdob. nauk. stup. d. e. n. Donetsk: DNU, 32 (in Ukr.)
Ponomarenko, V.S. & Trydid, O.M. & Kyzym, M.O. (2003). Stratehiia rozvytku pidpryiemstva v umovakh kryzy. Kharkiv: Vydavnychyi Dim «INZhEK», 328.
Vasylenko, V.A. & Tkachenko, H.I. (2003). Stratehichne upravlinnia: navch. posib. Kyiv: TsUL, 396. (in Ukr.)
Yvanov, Yu.B. & Tyshchenko, A. N. & Drobytko, N. A. & Abramov, O. S. (2004). Konkurentosposobnost predpryiatyia: otsenka, dyahnostyka, stratehyia. Kharkiv: KhNEU, 256.
Otenko, I. P. & Poltavska, Ye. O. (2005). Upravlinnia konkurentnymy perevahamy pidpryiemstva: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: KhNEU, 212 (in Ukr.)
Sharovatov, M. A. (2005). Formirovanie i otsenka konkurentnogo statusa deystvuyushchikh predprinimatelskikh struktur. Avtoref. dis. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni k. ekonom. nauk. Spetsialnost 08.00.05 «Ekonomika i upravlenie narodnym khozyaystvom: predprinimatelstvo». Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy inzhenerno-ekonomicheskiy unіversitet, 19 (in Russ.)
Dolzhanskyi, I.Z. & Zahorna, T.O. (2006). Konkurentospromozhnist pidpryiemstva. Kyiv: TsNL, 384. (in Ukr.)
Skibitskyi, O. M. (2006). Stratehichnyi menedzhment. Kyiv: TsNL, 312.
Cherneha, V.V. (2008). Konkurentostiikist pidpryiemstv ta mekhanizmiv yii zabezpechennia: monohrafiia [vidpovid. red. O.D. Hudzynskyi]. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi unt tekhnolohii ta dyzainu, In-t pidhotovky kadriv derzhavnoi sluzhby zainiatosti Ukrainy. Kyiv: IPK DSZU, 235 (in Ukr.)
Koretskyi, B. M. & Khopchan, M. I. (2008). Zasady pobudovy alhorytmu metodyky otsinky konkurentnykh pozytsii subiekta hospodariuvannia u tranzytyvnii ekonomitsi. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 5, 39–44 (in Ukr.)
Kyrchata, I.M. & Poiasnyk, H. V. (2009). Upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu pidpryiemstva v hlobalnomu seredovyshchi. Kharkiv: KhNADU, 160 (in Ukr.)
Filyppova, S.V. & Cherkasova, S.O. (2010). Otsiniuvannia ta analiz konkurentospromozhnosti promyslovykh pidpryiemstv yak osnovni funktsii upravlinnia protsesom yii orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho zabezpechennia. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu, 3, 110–115. (in Ukr.)
Kholod, V. V. (2010) Chotyrokhvektorna model rozvytku konkurentnoho statusu. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/17_AND_2010/Economics/ 68045.doc (in Ukr.)
Burmaka, M.M. & Burmaka, T.M. (2011). Upravlinnia rozvytkom pidpryiemstva na prykladi pidpryiemstv budivelnoi haluzi). Kharkiv: KhNADU, 204 p.
Herasymenko, Yu. V. & Bondarenko, A. V. (2011) Upravlinnia konkurentnym statusom pidpryiemstva. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/31_ONBG_2011/Economic s/10_96826.doc (in Ukr.)
Reznichenko, D.V. (2012). Katehorialnyi aparat konkurentospromozhnosti sotsialno-ekonomichnoi systemy. Innovatsiina ekonomika, 8, 171-175. (in Ukr.)
Matvieiev, V. V. (2014). Systema poniat, yaki kharakteryzuiut konkurentnyi stan pidpryiemstva. Naukovyi zhurnal «Intelekt XXI», 2, 55–62 (in Ukr.)
Terovanesova, O.Iu. (2014). Konkurentnyi status pidpryiemstva v systemi naukovykh katehorii. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 48, 153 – 158. (in Ukr.)
Yatsenko, B.I. (2015). Teoretychni osnovy innovatsiinoho upravlinnia konkurentnym statusom pidpryiemstv. Efektyvna ekonomika, 12. Retrieved from http: // www. economy. nayka. com. ua/?n= 12&y= 2015 (in Ukr.)
Kuzmynchuk, N. V. & Terovanesova, O. Yu. (2016). Formuvannia konkurentnoho statusu pidpryiemstv mashynobuduvannia na osnovi resursno-diialnisnoho pidkhodu: kontseptualni zasady. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho nats. un-tu, 8. 1, 135-141 (in Ukr.)
Pavlovska, L. D. & Kosovych O. V. (2017). Modeliuvannia konkurentnoho statusu u systemi marketynhu pidpryiemstv. Implementatsiia naukovykh zasad ta perspektyvy doskonaloi marketynhovoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv yak rynkovo-oriientovanoi kontseptsii yikh rozvytku. Zhytomyr: Vyd. Yevenok O.O., 30–56 (in Ukr.)
Oriekhova, K. V. (2017). Modeliuvannia vplyvu faktoriv finansovoi bezpeky na konkurentnyi status mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstv. Prychornomorskyi naukovo-doslidnyi instytut ekonomiky ta innovatsii «Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii». Odesa, 14, 114–119.
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tomakh. (1975). Tom 6, 815. (in Ukr.)
Kosovych, O.V. (2013). Ekonomichnyi zmist ta shliakhy formuvannia konkurentnoho statusu pidpryiemstva. Naukovi pratsi Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky. Spetsvypusk, 178–184 (in Ukr.).