The conceptual study unit of crises and their impact on development of economic systems
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract.
Introduction. The term «crisis» to some extent affects the development methodology of any management decision are discrybed. The practice of modern economic development shows the actual impossibility of avoiding crises, which causes the importance and urgency of prompt recognition, understanding the nature and prerequisites of the crisis processes, justification of measures to transfer economic systems to a new level of functioning.
Purpose. The research aims at disclosure of definitions and roles of crises in the economic development of economic systems.
Results. The interpretations researched of the term "crisis" reflect two basic approaches to the analysis of crises occurring in the works of foreign and domestic authors - critical and positivist ones. With a negative attitude to the crisis they focus on its destructive influence on the functioning of the economic system. A positive attitude is based on the understanding the crisis as an objective process associated with the development of the system. Hence, the crisis is a turning point in the sequence of processes, events and activities. The research shows that the defining factor of the optimal commercial behavior of economic systems on both the macro and micro levels is their non- equilibrium self-organization, the functional stability in non-equilibrium states. If the equilibrium is a necessary condition for the functioning of economic systems, then the non-equilibrium represents a significant moment of transition to a new qualitative state when the system acquires a higher level of organization. Only when the economic system loses its functional strength, the processes of self-organization and formation of new efficient structures arise. While acquiring state of stability under new conditions of functioning, economic system goes through its equilibrium state as intermediate stages on the trajectory of non-equilibrium self-organization.
Conclusion. The possibility of development of economic systems must be linked with the state of instability as with selectable options for development, attractors. Therefore, most experts on the example of the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 indicate that the crisis is not only causing great losses, but also opens up great opportunities. Duality of crisis means that it causes the occurrence of a turning point in the functioning of economic systems and usually causes two ways out: the successful overcoming of crisis and entering a new level of development or degradation and preserving the existing trends. Thus, the consequence of the crisis may either be a development of the economic system or the destruction of it, either solving the accumulated contradictions or the emergence of a new crisis. The crisis is a certain stage of development and functioning of the economic system, which determines the objective necessity of qualitative transformation. In this connection it is necessary to deepen the analysis and study of the crisis and the crisis events in order to identify the main factors that contribute to crisis. Such studies can reveal features of economic systems development, determine the mechanism of forming the trends of their evolution. In addition, they will not just carry out passive regulation of a system, but based on precise knowledge of its properties, structure and characteristics of the stages of evolution, to generate the necessary impact on the system, provide targeted stimulation of certain bifurcation of the system to build its optimal structure.
Article Details
The authors published in this journal agree with following conditions:
1. The authors reserve to themselves the right to the authorship of their works and transfer the right of their first publication to the journal on the terms of Creatіve Common Attrіbutіon Lіcense which allows to freely extend to other persons the published work with an obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and its first publication in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to complete independent additional agreements concerning the not exclusive distribution of their work in the form in which it was published in this journal (for example, to place the work in the electronic storehouse of an establishment or to publish as a monograph component), under the condition of the preservation of the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. The journal’s policy allows and encourage the authors to place their manuscripts into the Internet (for example, in depositories of establishments or on personal web-sites) either before submitting of the manuscript for publication or during its editorial processing as it assists the occurrence of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing of the published work.
AGREEMENT
ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF COPYRIGHT
I, the author of the article / We, the authors of the manuscript _______________________________________________________________________
in case of its acceptance for publication, we transfer the following rights to the founders and editorial boards of the scientific publication "BULLETIN OF THE CHERKASY BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY. ECONOMIC SCIENCES. SERIES "ECONOMIC SCIENCES":
1. Publication of this article in Ukrainian (English, Russian, Polish) and distribution of its printed version.
2. Dissemination of the electronic version of the article through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
At the same time we reserve the right without consent of the editorial board and the founders:
1. Use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes.
2. To use the materials of the article in whole or in part for writing your own theses.
3. Use article materials to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
4. Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
a. personal web-pecypcax of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
b. web-pecypcax of the institutions where the authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
with. non-profit, open-source web-pecypcax (such as arXiv.org).
With this agreement, we also certify that the submitted manuscript meets the following criteria:
1. Does not contain calls for violence, incitement of racial or ethnic enmity, which are disturbing, threatening, shameful, libelous, cruel, indecent, vulgar, etc.
2. Does not infringe the copyrights and intellectual property rights of others or organizations; contains all the references to the cited authors and / or publications envisaged by applicable copyright law, as well as the results and facts used in the article by other authors or organizations.
3. It has not been previously published in other publishers and has not been published in other publications.
4. Does not include materials that are not subject to publication in the open press, in accordance with applicable law.
____________________ ___________________
First name, Last name, signature of the author
"___" __________ 20__
References
References:
1. Borysov B. A. (2010). Large economic dictionary. Moscow: Knizhnyi mir (in Russ.)
2. Rosenthal U., Pijnenburg B. (1991). Simulation – oriented scenarios. Crisis Management and Decision Making: Simulation Oriented Scenarios. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Barton L. (1993). Crisis in organizations: Managing and Communicating in the Heat of Chaos. Ohio, Cincinnati: South-Western, Publishing Company.
4. Vasylenko V.O. (2005). Crisis management of enterprise. Kyiv: Libra (in Ukr.)
5. Baldin K.V., Zverev V.S., Rukosuev A.V. (2007). Crisis management: macro and micro level. Moscow: «Dashko y Ko» (in Russ.)
6. Ivaniuta S.M. (2007). Crisis management. Kyiv: Znannia, (in Ukr.)
7. Hermann C. (1963). Some consequences of crisis which limit the viability of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 8, 61–82. Retrieved from http://www.voxprofessor.org/cfh/hermann-pubs/Hermann-Some%20Consequences%20of%20Crises%20Which%20Limit%20the%20Viablity%20of%20Org.pdf
8. Cherniavskyi A.D. (2006). Crisis management of enterprise. Kyiv: K.I.S. (in Ukr.).
9. Buryi S.A., Matsekha D.S. (2006). Crisis management and management solutions - problems of small businesses. Kyiv: TOV "Triada-M" (in Ukr.).
10. Shtanhret A.M., Kopyliuk O.I. (2007). Crisis management of enterprise. Kyiv: Znannia (in Ukr.).
11 Zharkovskaia E.P., Brodskyi B.E. (2004). Crisis management. Moscow: Omega-L (in Russ.).
12. Lihonenko L.O. (2000). Crisis management of enterprise: theoretical and methodological foundations and practical tools. Kyiv: Naukova dumka (in Ukr.)
13. ForexAW 2007-2015. Retrieved from http://forexaw.com/http://forexaw.com/TERMs/Society/Shocks_and_disasters/Economic_Crisis/l840_Кризис_Crisis_это#h3-0 (in Russ.)
14. Ukrainian centre for economic and political studies named after Olexander Razumkov. Retrieved from http://razumkov.org.ua/upload/ukraine-vid_kryzy_doKryzy.pdf (in Ukr.)