The editorial policy of the journal is based on the principles of transparency, academic integrity, and compliance with international standards of publication ethics, including the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the practices of leading scholarly journals indexed in Scopus and Web of Science.

Any information obtained during the peer-review process is strictly confidential and must not be used by editors, editorial board members, or reviewers for personal gain, academic advantage, or disclosure to third parties. Peer review is conducted exclusively for the purpose of scholarly evaluation and the improvement of publication quality.

Editors, reviewers, and members of the editorial board are required to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest that may influence the objectivity of manuscript evaluation. A conflict of interest may arise from academic, professional, financial, institutional, personal, or other relationships with authors, organizations, or institutions associated with submitted manuscripts.

In the event of a conflict of interest related to a specific manuscript, the Editor-in-Chief is obliged to recuse themselves and delegate editorial responsibility to another member of the editorial board. Similarly, any editorial board member involved in the editorial process must abstain from participation in the review or decision-making process when any circumstances exist that may compromise impartiality.