FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN THE ACTIVITIES OF TOURISM ENTITIES (theoretical and methodological foundations)

Main Article Content

Oleksiy SKIDANOV

Abstract

Introduction. The tourism industry functions as a complex ecosystem where the effectiveness of individual enterprises increasingly depends on the quality of interactions within the value chain. Organizational and economic relations (OER) among tourism stakeholders form the foundation for destination competitiveness, innovation capacity, and resilience to crises. However, despite the recognized importance of these relations, there remains a significant gap between the objective need for deep cooperation and the fragmented, often purely competitive nature of interactions observed in practice.


Purpose. The purpose of this article is to develop theoretical and methodological foundations for the formation and development of organizational and economic relations among tourism sector stakeholders, aimed at enhancing their synergistic efficiency and the competitiveness of destinations.


Methods. The research is based on a systemic approach that integrates stakeholder theory, network analysis, and institutional economics. Theoretical generalization and synthesis were employed to conceptualize the essence and structure of OER. Comparative analysis was used to typologize the main forms of these relations (competitive, cooperative, network-based, cluster-based, and integrated). Methods of abstraction and modeling facilitated the development of a cyclic methodological model for the strategic management of OER.


Results. The study conceptualizes OER as a multi-level system of formal and informal linkages arising in the process of tourism product creation, distribution, and consumption. A detailed typology of OER forms is presented, highlighting their distinct characteristics in terms of trust levels, flexibility, governance mechanisms, and potential for synergistic effects. The core contribution is the development of a four-phase cyclic methodological model comprising: (1) Diagnosis and Analysis (stakeholder mapping, social capital assessment, SNA); (2) Design of the Target Model (vision definition, form selection, rule establishment); (3) Institutional and Instrumental Support (legal framework, digital platforms, funding); and (4) Implementation and Monitoring (KPI tracking, adaptation). The model integrates the interests of all stakeholders, macro- and microenvironmental factors, and institutional support instruments.


Originality. The scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive, systems-based approach to OER as a strategically managed asset rather than a passive outcome of market activity. Unlike previous fragmented studies focusing on individual forms of interaction, this research proposes an integrated cyclic model that addresses the entire lifecycle of OER development, incorporating social capital assessment as a critical prerequisite and digitalization as a key enabling factor.


Conclusion. The development of organizational and economic relations is a key determinant of tourism destination competitiveness, sustainable development, and industry resilience. The proposed methodological model provides a practical framework for stakeholders and destination managers to systematically transition from fragmented competition to synergistic cooperation. Future research should focus on quantitative assessment of model effectiveness, the impact of digital transformation (AI, blockchain) on OER, and the development of institutional mechanisms for public-private partnership in tourism.

Article Details

Section
Статті

References

Buhalis D. Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management. 2000. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 97–116.

Hall C. M. Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial ecology of sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2019. Vol. 27. No. 7. P. 1044–1060.

Jamal T., Camargo B. A. Sustainable tourism, justice and an ethic of care: Toward the just destination. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2014. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 11–30.

Novelli M., Schmitz B., Spencer T. Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience. Tourism Management. 2006. Vol. 27. No. 6. P. 1141–1152.

Porter M. E. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review. 1998. Vol. 76. No. 6. P. 77–90.

Porter M. E. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly. 2000. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 15–34.

Scott N., Baggio R., Cooper C. Network analysis and tourism: From theory to practice. Bristol : Channel View Publications, 2008. 264 p.

Tinsley R., Lynch P. Small tourism business networks and destination development. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2001. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 367–378.

Weiermair K. The growth of tourism enterprises. Tourism Recreation Research. 2001. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 15–26.

Gunn C. A. Tourism planning: Basics, concepts, cases. 3rd ed. New York : Taylor & Francis, 1994. 442 p.

Dwyer L., Kim C. Destination competitiveness: determinants and indicators. Current Issues in Tourism. 2003. Vol. 6. No. 5. P. 369–414.

Ritchie J. R. B., Crouch G. I. The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. Wallingford : CABI Publishing, 2003. 304 p.

Bramwell B., Lane B. Tourism collaboration and partnerships: Politics, practice and sustainability. Bristol : Channel View Publications, 2000. 347 p.

Bornhorst T., Ritchie J. B., Sheehan L. Determinants of tourism success for DMOs & destinations: An empirical examination of stakeholders perspectives. Tourism Management. 2010. Vol. 31. No. 5. P. 572–589.

Presenza A., Cipollina M. Analysing tourism stakeholders networks. Tourism Review. 2010. Vol. 65. No. 4. P. 17–30.

Volgger M., Pechlaner H. Requirements for destination management organizations in destination governance: Understanding DMO success. Tourism Management. 2014. Vol. 41. P. 64–75.

Doroshenko S. I. Stratehichne upravlinnia rozvytkom turystychnykh destynatsii: orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi aspekt : monohrafiia. Kyiv : DNNU «Akademiia finansovoho upravlinnia», 2018. 312 s. [in Ukrainian].

Tkachenko T. O. Stalyi rozvytok turyzmu: teoriia, metodolohiia, biznes-realii : navch. posib. Kyiv : Kyivskyi natsionalnyi torhovelno-ekonomichnyi universytet, 2019. 488 s. [in Ukrainian].

Liubitseva O. V. Formuvannia klasternykh struktur v turyzmi yak faktor pidvyshchennia rehionalnoi konkurentospromozhnosti. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. 2020. № 22. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/ (data zvernennia: 12.05.2025). [in Ukrainian].

World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). World Tourism Barometer. 2023. URL: https://www.unwto.org/ (data zvernennia: 12.05.2025).

World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). Economic Impact Reports. 2023. URL: https://wttc.org/ (data zvernennia: 12.05.2025).

Pro turyzm : Zakon Ukrainy vid 15.09.1995 № 324/95-VR. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/324/95-%D0%B2%D1%80 (data zvernennia: 12.05.2025). [in Ukrainian].

Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Turystychna diialnist v Ukraini. 2023. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (data zvernennia: 12.05.2025). [in Ukrainian].

Murphy P. E., Murphy A. E. Strategic management for tourism communities: Bridging the gaps. Bristol : Channel View Publications, 2004. 408 p.

Bornhorst T., Ritchie J. B., Sheehan L. Determinants of tourism success for DMOs & destinations: An empirical examination of stakeholders perspectives. Tourism Management. 2010. Vol. 31. No. 5. P. 572–589.

Pearce D. G. Toward an integrative conceptual framework of destinations. Journal of Travel Research. 2014. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 141–153.

Sainaghi R. From contents to processes: Versus a dynamic destination management model (DDMM). Tourism Management. 2006. Vol. 27. No. 5. P. 1053–1063.

Franch M. Marketing delle destinazioni turistiche: Metodi, approcci e strumenti. Milano : McGraw-Hill, 2010. 256 p.